women’s voices – This Magazine https://this.org Progressive politics, ideas & culture Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:12:16 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.4 https://this.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/cropped-Screen-Shot-2017-08-31-at-12.28.11-PM-32x32.png women’s voices – This Magazine https://this.org 32 32 On the importance of speaking out https://this.org/2016/11/01/on-the-importance-of-speaking-out/ Tue, 01 Nov 2016 18:00:39 +0000 https://this.org/?p=16087 ThisMagazine50_coverLores-minFor our special 50th anniversary issue, Canada’s brightest, boldest, and most rebellious thinkers, doers, and creators share their best big ideas. Through ideas macro and micro, radical and everyday, we present 50 essays, think pieces, and calls to action. Picture: plans for sustainable food systems, radical legislation, revolutionary health care, a greener planet, Indigenous self-government, vibrant cities, safe spaces, peaceful collaboration, and more—we encouraged our writers to dream big, to hope, and to courageously share their ideas and wish lists for our collective better future. Here’s to another 50 years!


Speaking out is a tough job. First, you have to master the language. Then, you have to look good. Also, you have to be eloquent. Most of the time, you should be a man. But finding listeners who pay attention and help is even tougher. So why bother to speak out—especially if you are a woman wearing a veil whose husband has been arrested in the war on terror? Isn’t it a lost cause? Perdu d’avance!

My husband, Maher Arar, is a Canadian citizen born in Syria who has lived here since he was 17. In September 2002, he couldn’t convince his harsh FBI interrogators he was innocent and had nothing to do with Al-Qaeda. Unfortunately for him, everything conspired against him: being a Muslim post-9/11 is enough to get you arrested—or worse.

A telecommunications engineer by training, he was considered smart and thus dangerous. His extensive travel for work became “evidence” he had travelled to meet shadowy figures. His travel itinerary didn’t help: entering the U.S. for a stopover was deemed proof he was looking for trouble. You go to sleep as an innocent person. You wake up and you are guilty! Of what, you don’t know.

After many days in solitary confinement, my husband was shackled and sent to Syria on a private jet—“ghost planes” as they came to be known. It took him to his tormentors: Syrian torturers. The perfect example of an extraordinary rendition, if you want to use a sophisticated legal jargon. Or simply stated: the subcontracting of torture. Because even the global war on terror can’t escape the globalization of economies. We arrest. You torture. We design. You sweat and do the dirty job.

So why speak out? Indeed, for many weeks, I really didn’t have much to say. “My husband disappeared.” That’s all I could say. Where? When? I didn’t know. Nobody wanted to tell me. Speaking out is not easy. But we don’t speak out for the sake of it. We speak out because we are desperate. Our voice is the only thing left to react, to push away the oppression, the crawling silence, and the heavy jail doors closing slowly on my mind and on my husband.

First the disappearance of my husband made newspaper headlines. People wanted to know everything about him—a sense of voyeurism mixed with a healthy dose of curiosity. We were one year after 9/11. No terrorist attacks happened in Canada. So maybe my husband was the sleeping Canadian terrorist that we missed and that our vigilant American friends caught. That “maybe” will never quit us. It will haunt us. It will hang over our heads indefinitely.

Later, after officials confirmed my husband was imprisoned in Syria, interest dropped. The curiosity faded. More collateral damage from the war on terror. A simple incident. Business as usual. Some people shrugged. Few people cared.

But I continued to speak out. I wanted people to know that my husband was a good father, a nice husband, and an honest citizen. I spoke out to say this injustice wasn’t just done to him, but to his children and to Canada. Even those who did believe me told me my chances of getting him back were feeble. Deep inside, I agreed but I knew I had to speak out until the last days of my life. It became my raison d’être.

Many times during those desperate moments, people tried to discourage me. Whispering in the dark, they would say: She makes her case even harder by going to the media; quiet diplomacy is much better than giving interviews; she shouldn’t hurt the image of Syria. People will always try to silence you when you speak out. Your persistence disturbs. Your perseverance bothers. Your words make them cringe. Your words make them think. Your words make them look deep inside. They are afraid.

Among chaos, there is serenity, and among darkness there is light. I found that light by speaking out. It helped me survive despair, chaos, darkness, and bitterness. I stood up on my shaking knees. But I stood up. Eventually, a door opened and many others followed, like Russian dolls. You open one and find another one and another one. Slowly, steadily, people grew outraged. They spoke out. We spoke out!

My husband was released 375 days after he was arrested. He came back as a zombie. A man from a grave. A man with no words. Just a terrible pain inside of him. Humiliation and suffering. A man who couldn’t speak out.

But with his release, something magical happened too. People wanted to listen. They wanted to hear from him. Their ears were now ready. Speaking out helped. It paved the road to justice. Speaking out? It is something we must all embrace for a better, more just future.

Je ne regrette rien!

]]>
It’s time to amplify women’s voices in Canadian media https://this.org/2016/10/26/its-time-to-amplify-womens-voices-in-canadian-media/ Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:02:01 +0000 https://this.org/?p=16043 ThisMagazine50_coverLores-minFor our special 50th anniversary issue, Canada’s brightest, boldest, and most rebellious thinkers, doers, and creators share their best big ideas. Through ideas macro and micro, radical and everyday, we present 50 essays, think pieces, and calls to action. Picture: plans for sustainable food systems, radical legislation, revolutionary health care, a greener planet, Indigenous self-government, vibrant cities, safe spaces, peaceful collaboration, and more—we encouraged our writers to dream big, to hope, and to courageously share their ideas and wish lists for our collective better future. Here’s to another 50 years!


Christine Lagarde’s quip during the 2008 global financial meltdown raised hackles and elicited laughter. “If only Lehman Brothers had had a few sisters,” the then-finance minister of France observed, “we might not be in this mess.” But her off-the-cuff critique of the testosterone-fuelled risk-taking of predominantly male investment bankers precipitating the financial collapse is bolstered by academic research. And it speaks to a greater truth: Ensuring that women’s voices are heard as often as men’s, and that their perspectives exert similar influence, is critical to our collective future—not just in pursuit of more stable economic markets.

It may seem that Canada has achieved necessary parity, given the ample evidence of how much more powerful women’s voices are today. In Justin Trudeau’s gender-balanced federal cabinet, strong, articulate female ministers manage justice, health, and the environment portfolios. Three of the country’s most populous provinces are led by women, and we’ve had a female Chief Justice of the Supreme Court since 2000.

And yet, in the grander scheme of things—including the realms of business, sports, and entertainment—women’s voices remain seriously under-represented. Even though women have made up more than 60 percent of university graduates for some years now, and contribute at senior levels in virtually every sector, elected officials across the country still average threequarters male. And independent Canadian research conducted in fall 2015 found that men’s perspectives continue to outnumber women’s by three or four to one in many of the nation’s most influential news media.

For the sake of all our futures, we need to change that. It’s now widely understood that in countries around the world where women’s voices count, everybody’s prospects are enhanced. A raft of respected research also makes clear that including the views of competent women leads to better business decisions and more rigorous science.

The truth is that many women’s day-to-day realities remain profoundly different from their male relatives and colleagues. Because they conceive, bear, and—for the most part—remain more responsible for raising children, women not only have different life experiences, but society also views and treats women differently. It’s not surprising that their perspectives and priorities reflect that.

It’s true that ceding the floor to women more often will shift the emphasis of our public discourse, and make us pay more attention to things currently not so prominent. But would less focus on hockey fights and more on health research be a bad thing? So-called “women’s issues” might get front-page treatment—even when the women aren’t wearing bikinis! And the downstream benefits include more family-friendly policies, stronger communities, and lower income inequality.

That said, our research finds that many female experts are less eager to be interviewed and pontificate than their male colleagues. Critics have argued women’s voices aren’t as prominent because most women aren’t arrogant enough to think they have all the answers. That, too, seems like a benefit; as any news producer or astute observer can tell you, microphone hogs don’t always deliver value-added commentary.

Informed Opinions, the non-profit project I lead, has worked with more than a thousand female experts across Canada in almost every field. These women have deep knowledge about important issues, and hundreds of them are now sharing their experience-informed analysis of current issues with the broader public. We all benefit as a result.

In an effort to assess what difference their amplified voices are making, we recently conducted an experiment, creating a word cloud out of 100 news commentaries penned by women and published in daily newspapers. When we compared the most prominent words in their analyses to those most prominent in commentaries written by men, we discovered that all sorts of topics get significantly less attention when women’s voices aren’t present. These include: access, assault, care, discrimination, equality, families, justice, policy, services, sexual support, treatment, and violence.

Canada’s self-definition is one that privileges equality of rights and opportunities, public health care, and social justice. Ensuring that women’s voices in all their diversity have as much influence as men’s is essential to not only building on that identity, but supporting our future success.

Illustration by Matthew Daley

]]>