May-June 2019 – This Magazine https://this.org Progressive politics, ideas & culture Fri, 07 Jun 2019 15:20:06 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.4 https://this.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/cropped-Screen-Shot-2017-08-31-at-12.28.11-PM-32x32.png May-June 2019 – This Magazine https://this.org 32 32 Death of the Rom-Com https://this.org/2019/06/06/death-of-the-rom-com/ Thu, 06 Jun 2019 18:36:25 +0000 https://this.org/?p=18784

I blame John Hughes for my great sleepover shutout of 1984. It was a Betamax copy of his teen romantic comedy Sixteen Candles that was my downfall. While my friends clapped their hands and cheered at the final scene that brings together Samantha Baker and Jake Ryan, I was silent.

I just couldn’t buy it. The two barely talked at all, how did this happen? My friends looked at me in disbelief, like I had just told them one of the members of their beloved Wham was gay. My 13-year-old-self lacked the rom-com gene and my slumber party invites suffered as a result.

Fast-forward 35 years, and I am not alone in my cynicism over the rom-com genre. The films are no longer as popular as they were in the 1990s and early 2000s, and romantic comedies now make less money at the box office than Meg Ryan’s bookstore in You’ve Got Mail. With the exception of 2018’s Crazy Rich Asians (a rom-com anomaly in other ways too, most notably in its non-white romantic representation), the 10 top-grossing romantic comedies of all time were all released at least a decade ago. Today’s moviegoers are more interested in superheroes than super-sized romance and would rather see Sandra Bullock blindfolded than romancing Ben Affleck.

Instead of grand romantic gestures and floppy Hugh Grant bangs, pop culture is now obsessed with messy modern love. Television and movie meet cutes (the scene in which the two people who will ultimately get together meet for the first time)—a rom-com staple— are now anything but cute. In the first episode of the FX series You’re the Worst, Jimmy and Gretchen’s meet cute involves a stolen wedding gift and an inappropriate comment about anal sex. It’s as if their meeting was orchestrated by a half-in-the-bag Marilyn Manson brandishing a rusty arrow instead of Cupid.

“Lies set to terrible pop songs,” is how Rebel Wilson’s character describes romantic comedies in her latest movie Isn’t It Romantic. In the film, Wilson’s character hits her head and wakes up to find herself stuck in a romantic comedy complete with all the genres cutesy clichés from synchronized dance numbers to the gay sidekick.

While the film does a great job of mocking rom-coms, making fun of the genre’s tired tropes is not hard (see also: They Came Together). What’s harder is straying from the outdated formula and making unconventional films about love. Anti-romantic comedies like Obvious Child, The Big Sick and Trainwreck all nail it, with unlikable and complicated characters; heavy subject matter like abortions and induced comas; and storylines that leave audiences guessing as to whether there will be a happy ever after.

And it’s not just the big screen that is breaking up with happy endings. The Netflix series Love stands out for its realistic portrayal of just how complicated dating and mating can be. The series follows the relationship ups and downs of nice-guy-to-a-fault Gus and perma-scowl and Parliaments-puffing Mickey. Ross and Rachel these two are not (Thank God!). Over the course of three seasons, the two survive a disastrous first date at Magic Castle, cheating and a night out with Andy Dick.

Love joins shows such as You’re the Worst, Catastrophe, Insecure, Girls and Crazy Ex-Girlfriend in acknowledging relationships are messy and often bring out the worst in us, not the best, as rom-coms would have us believe. People cheat, people change their minds, people can’t make up their minds, and rarely do characters in these shows think marriage is a good idea.

I would also like to give You’re the Worst and Love shout outs for realistic portrayals of addiction and mental health, and for actually acknowledging these things can co-exist with romantic love.

As far as I’m concerned, it was about time pop-culture love got complicated. Rom-coms are not only bad for our romantic expectations, they’re also offensive to woman, and sorely lacking in diversity. The genre shoves heteronormative stereotypes in our faces with a force equal to the holidays ramming Love Actually down our throats on repeat.

It’s painful to watch the John Hughes rom-coms of my youth and see how racist, sexist, homophobic and classist they actually are. And I am pretty sure that scene at the end of Sixteen Candles is not the nerd getting the girl, but actual rape.

Pop culture’s infatuation with realistic romance also comes at a time when the bloom is off the rose of reality shows like The Bachelor. Viewers are no longer tuning into the anti-feminist fairy tale like they used to. Season 22, (the one with Boring Arie) averaged only 6.2 million viewers per episode, in relation to 7.2 million the season before. And the show no longer produces the ever-lasting Chris Harrison-approved love that it used to.

One of the major problems with reality shows and rom-coms is that they have traditionally targeted women, yet been written by men. Thankfully, we no longer have to settle for that. A move towards more diversity in the writers’ room and away from mass-appeal movies and must-see network TV, has subverted the rom-com genre. And it has given us portrayals of relationships that are far from perfect in shows like Ilana Glazer and Abbi Jacobson’s Broad City, and Insecure, starring and co-created by Issa Rae.

It’s also not just creators that have changed, since Harry met Sally. How people meet and fall in love has changed. Social media, apps and online dating mean meet cutes have been replaced by swipes. And Ghosts of Girlfriends Past love has been replaced by ghosting—a modern scourge. But it’s not just Tinder that’s to blame.

As politics becomes more like an episode of Celebrity Apprentice on acid and less like reality, we turn to entertainment that accurately reflects the world around us for comfort. Give me whirlwind celebrity romance trash fires like Pete and Ariana over fairy-tale royal weddings any day. There is something perversely life-affirming about pop-culture portrayals of messy love, because, unlike the Cupid-meets-Lady Luck, lottery-winning love that Nicolas Cage and Bridget Fonda’s characters found, back in 1994, it could happen to you.

“Did I only like her because she was fucked up?” Gus asks himself, in one episode of Love. “Did she only like me because she was fucked up?”

What a perfect piece of dialogue. Forget Jerry Maguire, this completes me.

]]>
Turn Me On https://this.org/2019/05/31/turn-me-on/ Fri, 31 May 2019 17:10:40 +0000 https://this.org/?p=18781

Photo: Mo Phung

An average day for married couple Jeremie Saunders and Bryde MacLean might include dates with their respective partners, an interview with a camgirl, or conversations about orgasm scavenger hunts. Nothing’s off the table for the Halifax-based co-hosts of the Turn Me On podcast, a series on sex, in all its fun and messy forms.

In the two years since its inception, Turn Me On has tackled sex toys, porn, fan fiction, threesomes, kinks and a swath of other topics with “intelligence, humour and… a little pillow talk”—as its tagline proudly proclaims.

“We’re talking about something that, for the most part, everyone does or everyone has an experience with or everyone thinks about,” Saunders says. “None of us would be here if it wasn’t for this one thing yet, for whatever reason, it’s just drowning in taboo.” For MacLean, the show is “really about how we talk about sex as much as about the sex that we’re having.” To deepen those conversations, the hosts call on guests, such as Jenny Yuen, author of Polyamorous: Living and Loving More, Maryanne Fisher PhD, a psychology professor with expertise in female intrasexual competition, and Russell Louder, a trans, non- binary musician and performance artist.

Saunders and MacLean share the details of their own sexual adventures (and misadventures), too, discussing the sometimes-tricky dynamics of their open marriage. Many listeners have told the couple they were rst drawn to the podcast by this intimate element, as non-monogamy moves into the mainstream. Still, Turn Me On doesn’t take itself too seriously, and runs episodes with titles ranging from “Cum On The Couch,” to “What’s A Gold Star Lesbian?” to “Can Robots Have STDs?”

“We’ve covered so much, but there’s still so much work to be done and so many people to find to talk to,” MacLean says. Loyal listeners have encouraged the pair to go beyond the studio, so earlier this year they took the unconventional and honest sex-ed podcast to live venues across Eastern Canada, which they felt took episodes to a new level. MacLean says:

“When we record at home we always have the option to edit things out, but on a live show, once it’s out someone’s mouth, it’s out there. The stakes are higher too, when it’s live, and my impulse to share and be honest is even stronger: The audience can see you and people are intuitive, so they can tell if you’re holding something back.”

Vulnerability, is an essential tenet of the podcast. For Saunders, who lives with cystic fibrosis—a chronic and fatal lung disease—it’s part of a greater pursuit to bring the conversations around disability, illness and sex out from behind closed doors. The effort complements his work on Sickboy, an acclaimed podcast about illness and disease, which he hosts with his two best friends.

“It was always a question that I found really fascinating: You live with this illness that affects you in several ways. How does it affect your relationships? How does it affect your sex life?” Saunders says. That desire for honest, shame-free dialogue comes through in Turn Me On, when he speaks with guests who have a physical disabilities, mental illness or bodies deemed out of the ordinary. Saunders says people get “weird and sort of uncomfortable going into that territory,” and that he hopes to shift perspectives by asking those important questions.

At TEDxToronto 2017—nine months after launching Turn Me On—Saunders presented the keynote address: “Embracing your expiry date.” He shared how his illness forced him to accept his own mortality and live without fear, particularly in his career and relationships. He and MacLean hope to inspire listeners to seek out that kind of intimacy and honesty with themselves and others.

And beyond sex, Turn Me On offers those tuning in an opportunity to feel less alone in their unique ways of being and desires, MacLean says. “I think that really motivates me to keep doing what we’re doing, because loneliness just keeps us trapped— we’re not evolving if we’re not relating.”

]]>
My Mother Gave My Boyfriend a Handwriting Test https://this.org/2019/05/27/my-mother-gave-my-boyfriend-a-handwriting-test/ Mon, 27 May 2019 16:20:52 +0000 https://this.org/?p=18778

His hand slid underneath my sweater, then rested on my bare waist. We locked eyes and my breath caught. I was leaning up against the wall in the narrow hallway of my one-bedroom apartment. He was so close, with his other hand against the wall beside my head. Both my palms were pressed firmly against the wall by my hips. He leaned in to kiss me.
“Wait,” I said.
He pulled back, puzzled.
“I really like you,” I continued. “Really like you. But if we’re going to continue, I’m going to need you to take a test for me.”

He dropped both his hands and stepped back. My entire body ached. What did I just do? Then he leaned in again, kissed my cheek, and walked out the door. He knew what this was about. I was agitated. But it had to be done. The sex can wait, I thought.

Less than two years before I met this man, I had been engaged. I met my ex when I was 17 and he was 21. I brought him home early in the relationship,to a joint birthday celebration for my mother and me. He brought her flowers and a card, and when he left, she called me into her room.

“Do you love him?” she asked.

“What?” I replied. “We just started dating.”

“If you don’t love him, leave,” she said. “He lies. Without compunction.”

My mother is a certified document examiner. Lawyers hire her to determine forgeries in court cases. As part of her training, she took courses in graphoanalysis. By reading someone’s handwriting, she could tell a hell of a lot about their character. She was holding the birthday card he’d given her. It was disconcerting.

But what 18-year-old woman listens to her mother where love is concerned? I stayed with him for six years, we got engaged, and months before the wedding date I finally admitted to myself my mother had been right. Until then I’d looked the other way as he manipulated me and lied repeatedly. He drove a wedge between me and most of my friends and my family, leaving me with few places to turn.

 

When I left him, I cursed myself for not having listened to my mother. I could have saved six years of my life. The handwriting never lies. Which brings us back to the hallway of my apartment, the new guy, and our almost- sex scene. I was sorry he left, but the test was a non-negotiable for me.

A few nights later, I dropped by his apartment on my way home from work.

“Have you thought about what I said?” I asked.

“I have. I’m just not sure,” he replied. “It’s strange. Do I want a woman I’ve never met to know so much about me?”

I smiled and pushed him further into his apartment. His roommates were out, and he had a desk tucked into the corner of the living room.

“Why don’t you go grab a pen and paper, then sit down and let me convince you?” I said.

As soon as he sat down, I walked over to him, dropped to my knees, then looked up and smiled.

“Why don’t you write a few lines?” I said, reaching for his zipper.

He closed his eyes for a moment, opened them, and started to write.

I saw my mother a few days later and triumphantly handed her the illicitly procured sample.

“What’s this?” she asked.

“I met someone. I really like him, and we’ve been seeing each other for a while. But before I let it become anything serious, I told him he had to let you analyze his writing. This time, I’m going to listen to you, Mom.”

She took the sheet of paper with a smile, but then when she looked at it, her face fell.

“What is it?” I asked.

“He’s depressed,” she said. “And you don’t need that right now.”

Depressed? I thought. Man, I gotta work on my technique.

“Depressed?” I said. “What are you talking about? He is not depressed.” She turned the paper around and pointed. Part of the deal with the handwriting sample is that it must be in cursive and written on unlined paper. My mother was pointing to the tail end of each sentence, how it sloped abruptly downward.

“That’s not a good sign,” she said.
I closed my eyes and bit my lip. Then I looked down at the ground to compose myself. Yes, I was a 24-year-old woman, but I was not about to tell my mother that he had been distracted by what was going on under the desk.

“How about I get you another sample?” I asked.
“I want him sitting in front of me while he writes it,” she said.

Later that night, we were out for dinner at a local Tex Mex place. From Day 1, he knew I loved to eat and made every effort to seduce me on that front: a home-made chocolate cheesecake on my birthday, a veal stew on a Friday night, and Mexican food at every opportunity. It was over papas fritas that I told him how the ante had been upped. He looked skyward and sighed.

I knew he thought I was ridiculous, and I wouldn’t have insisted, but I really liked him.

When I broke o my engagement to my ex, I swore off dating for a year. I’m not sure why I put such an artificial date on it, but it seemed to me that anything sooner would be too soon, and anything later would be too late.

After that, I started out slow, dating a couple of guys whom people fixed me up with. And then a male friend of mine said, “I’ve got the perfect guy for you. For now.” He introduced me to his friend, and we hit it off okay. We dated for a while, never quite clicking. I was just thrilled to be with someone again. My mom didn’t say much, but she clucked her disapproval whenever he was around, no graphology required.

And then one night, we went as part of a group to a bar downtown. It was a warm evening, and we were sitting out on the terrace. I knew everyone around the table—the guy I was dating, the friend who introduced us, and some friends of theirs—except one. The man sitting directly across from me. I had never met him before, but it didn’t feel that way.

As the evening wore on, I grew agitated. I was here with the wrong guy. I should be with that guy across the table. I could not take my eyes off him. I hung onto his every word. Little did I know then that he was thinking,

“How did she end up here with him?”

It didn’t take us long to get together. There was something between us that was unlike anything I’d felt before. And yet still I felt like I needed my mother’s approval. So, there we were, three weeks in, on the couch watching TV in my apartment. I was cuddled up against him, my potential Mr. Right, my entire body humming from being so close. My fingers danced on his thigh. “So will you please re-take the test?”

A few days later, my parents were at work in their second-floor retail shop. My mother helps my dad run his business while keeping a small office for herself in the back. They were both standing behind the display counter when a stranger, mid-20s, walked into the shop.

“Mrs. Matlin?” he asked, approaching the counter with his right hand extended. “I’m dating your daughter and I’m here to take my written exam.”

My mother was taken aback. I hadn’t warned her. How could I have? I didn’t know myself that this was how he would go about it. It was so out of character for him. He was quiet, introverted and really stubborn.

When she recovered, she took his hand and shook it, then introduced him to my father. She then led him into her office and sat him down at the desk. She handed him a pen and paper, then waited in silence while he wrote.

When he handed her the page, she smiled with relief.

“You passed with flying colours,” she told him.

“I have the all-clear to date your daughter?” he asked.

My mother laughed. “Yes. Of course.”

He turned to go, anxious to get home to me with the news. It was a time before cellphones.

“There’s just one thing,” my mother said. He turned around.

“We just received a shipment of 10 boxes, mostly catalogues. Any chance you could bring them up the stairs for us?” she asked.

That’s my mother in a nutshell.

The man who would one day be my husband forever endeared himself to my parents that day by lugging all 10 boxes up the stairs. By the time he got home to me, he was in a sweat. I opened my door and saw him standing there, breathless and sporting a wicked smile. He put his hand on my chest and steered me backwards into the hallway of my apartment, and up against the wall.

“I passed,” he whispered in my ear.

“What?” I asked. “What do you mean?”

He pulled away, looked me in the eye and put his hand behind my neck.

“I mean, I went to see your mother, introduced myself, wrote a few lines, and she told me I passed.”

“When did you—”

He had moved in and was softly kissing my neck. Electric sparks red in my brain.

The story can wait, I thought.

]]>
Get Naked and Spell https://this.org/2019/05/22/get-naked-and-spell/ Wed, 22 May 2019 16:02:24 +0000 https://this.org/?p=18792

“Do earrings count as clothing?” asked a brunette contestant, decked out in multiple sweaters. “They’re not on the list.” It was the very first Strip Spelling Bee I’d organized and we were already running into problems. “And,” she continued coyly, “if so, do they count as two items?” She tapped the dangling emerald drops, and the audience laughed.

The idea behind the event in its earliest, totally experimental incarnation, was that contestants would be challenged to spell words of increasing difficulty over three rounds. If they got a word right, they would sit back down, but if they got it wrong, they’d have to striptease off an item of clothing to a random pop song. Round two would entail two items, and round three, three.

Makes sense, right? And I de ned all the items that would count as clothing on a list, which I handed out to everyone, alongside the rules, at the start.

What I didn’t count on was that contestants would quibble so much that I’d have to change all the rules one hour in. I was starting to feel flustered; this was not turning out to be the good time I’d imagined.

 

Back in 2007, I was new to event planning. After a night out in a smoky bar, where the music was so loud it shook my earwax loose, I began to dream of other kinds of nights out: events catered to quiet yet playful folks like me, events that expanded the boundary of who could participate and who could perform.

I started with Slowdance Nights—like a prom re-do for grown-ups. Then once I realized how easy it was to dream up a fanciful idea, book a venue, create a Facebook event page and then get actual people to come out, I experimented with a quick succession of alternative events—social science experiments that masqueraded as a “good time.” There was: Advice Night, where I read out anonymous problems on stage, and then the crowd would brainstorm solutions. The Bawling League, (a counterpoint to comedy festivals), where folks shared things that make them cry. Crowd Karaoke, where all the awful parts of regular karaoke (the bad singers and the interminable wait for your turn) were fixed by everyone singing along—choir-like—to pop songs together. Cardboard Fort Night, where people were given unlimited sheets of cardboard and duct-tape, to make the most magnificent structures they could dream up.

There were scores more. The Idea Adoption Agency. Show & Sell. The Arcade Choir. Drunken Christmas Caroloke. I was on a roll, and the next thing I wanted to do was a Hipster Spelling Bee for adults.

I was excited about the Bee. But the response was lukewarm. Megan, the person I was seeing at the time, told me she had invited her friend Charlotte, but was rebuffed.

“A spelling bee?” Charlotte had exclaimed. “Snore. The only way I’d go to something like that is if there were stripping.”

When I heard that… lightbulb.jpg!

A strip spelling bee seemed like a golden idea—until that first evening, when I actually tried to manifest it. The problem was, there were no existing rules for such a combination of vocations. I’d Googled the idea, but back in 2007, the only thing that popped up was an audio clip of a woman stripping on a radio show. So, I had to make up rules based on my best guess of what would work. And that’s how I ended up on stage debating the legality of accessories in front of an increasingly restless audience, anxious to see flesh.

 

“I’m trashing the rules,” I announced to the crowd.

The contestants, sitting overdressed in the front row, looked taken aback. I knew it was unfair to change the rules mid-game, but I had warned everyone that this was an experiment. That it might be a delight or a disaster.

“Throw out the lists,” I said, crumpling up my own. “They don’t matter.” Then I let everyone in on the rule changes I’d just made.

Now, when a word is misspelled, contestants do a third of their clothing. That way I don’t have to micromanage definitions—and those wearing the entire contents of their closets don’t have an unfair advantage.”

The next dramatic recalibration I made was to have my co-host, Sofi, jump straight to the most difficult Round Three words. I’d underestimated how easy the words we’d done so far would be. A Round One word like “kaleidoscope” was anyone’s to ace.

“Speller, your word is kiaugh,” So said, pronouncing the suddenly high-stakes word key-ock.

The crowd gasped at the abrupt spike in difficulty, then laughed. I felt my own tension dissipate. “It’s a noun. It means distress or worry. Its origin is Scottish Gaelic.”

“Um,” the speller turned to look at us at our table.

He stalled. “Can I hear it in a sentence?”

Sofi handed the microphone to me, and I scrambled to come up with a preposterous sentence that made sense but was ultimately unhelpful.

“I am full of kiaugh because my kayak has a hole in it, as does my bum.”

The crowd laughed. But still, I was worried that I might have given him a clue by using the word kayak. “C—” he began.

Ding! Sofi rang her bell with delight, signalling a misspelling. The audience crowed. The speller sighed. “I overthought it,” he said, shaking his head.

“Oh, so sorry,” said Sofi, not sorry at all. “The correct spelling is K-I-A-U-G-H.” She spelled it slowly, and the audience followed closely, seeing where they’d gone wrong themselves, as they’d mentally spelled along.

The opening beats of “SexyBack” by Justin Timberlake thumped through the room and our speller grabbed his shirt hem, his hips starting to sway.

 

After the ultimate success of the first strip Spelling Bee, I added new rules for future ones: I instituted a No-booing Policy and a No-photos Policy, in tandem with a Snitch Protocol, whereby the crowd was encouraged to surveil their neighbours and whistleblow any violators of the rules, after which they’d be rewarded with free drinks.

As host, I was the only person in the room allowed to take photos, and I cleared permissions with my spellers when they signed up.

“The photos don’t go anywhere,” I told the crowd. “They are hidden safely on my hard drive,” I said, my voice full of innuendo. “It’s my way of getting to know my spellers a little better, in private.” The crowd chuckled. The truth of the matter is that most of the photos I take, I never revisit. They are all blurry and dark, and they serve more as a means for me to remember the drunken proceedings than anything else. But some of them do bring back fond memories of notable contestants:

There was Greg*, a bearded senior and a university prof—and also a regular—who joyfully hopped around the stage each time. Alec, who never wanted photos taken because he was a second-grade teacher, but whose costumes were always exquisitely handmade. Tim, an actual former national spelling bee champion, who also happened to be an exhibitionist. Elena, who, after getting fully naked, reached up into herself, pulled out her Diva Cup and poured her own menstrual blood all over her tits as a finishing flourish. Mia, a trans woman who competed regularly, but who finally took her underwear off for the first time after she got her new vagina.

 

Back to that first night: under the blazing red lights, one speller had just failed his final word. “Sweet Child O’ Mine,” by Guns N’ Roses, echoed around the theatre, and he’d already dropped his leopard print jacket and leather vest. Soon, he was wearing nothing but his bright red underwear, which he tugged and teased, beckoning for cheers. The crowd obliged.

*All names have been changed.

]]>
A Thank-You Note to the Strangers Who Cared https://this.org/2019/05/16/a-thank-you-note-to-the-strangers-who-cared/ Thu, 16 May 2019 17:32:29 +0000 https://this.org/?p=18788

Dear Anonymous Crowdfunders,

Until the sign vanished from our front lawn last May, I use to have “spiritual exercises of the week” there, which some of you saw on your daily commute—timely calls to action, such as: “Black History is our history. Take time to learn a new story”; or “Hold someone who grieves this Mother’s Day.”

As a minister that was my way of caring for the spiritual needs of people who might never step through our church doors, like the gay atheist couple across the street who told us they meditated to the sign messages. Our neighbourhood isn’t immune from prejudice. Just last year a letter filled with anti-Islam rhetoric and graphic images was popped into everyone’s mailboxes. Knowing our church makes people feel safer is important to me. Our sign rental company used to post the notes I crafted onto our sign. Last May, I asked for: “Wish your Muslim neighbours a Ramadan Mubarak!” The owner refused, saying it was against his faith to encourage Islamic practices. The next month I asked for: “Celebrate God’s LGBTQ2 diversity with Pride.” Again, he took issue. I told him I wasn’t looking to change his beliefs—though I disagreed with them—but I was asking him not to censor mine. Then I suggested we try mediation.

I heard nothing back for the next few weeks, then within 24 hours of me requesting a notice about our Pride Sunday worship service, our sign just disappeared. My heart sank. An email arrived later, saying he’d removed the sign, because it infringed on city bylaws, and he didn’t want us to face fines. I asked if we could move it to a location in compliance. No reply. My faith says we have to put love into action, not just words. To do nothing next would have felt like being complicit in an act of hate. With the endorsement of my church, I led a human rights complaint against the sign company.

After the media picked up our story, some people wrote us hate mail. Some yelled down the phone. But many of you got in touch to thank us for taking a stand. One supporter said, “What struck me about your church of 35-40 people on a Sunday was that you were not powerbrokers in the city. You were risking purely for the sake of solidarity. It […] made me want to do more and be more because if you can, I can too.” Marina Dempster, who used to Instagram our sign messages, said the sign gave her “a sense of belonging to a shared consciousness which expressed kindness, encouragement, and inclusion.” Many of you said you wanted your spiritual exercises back!

Then, two of you, Maggie Knauss and Kate Manson, surprised us by starting a crowdfunding campaign, determined to never again let our messages of love be silenced. Donations from $5 to $500 have been coming in through the Canadahelps.org page, and we’re now half way to buying our own sign and to never again having to rent one and debate inclusive messages of love.

Our country has seen an increase in hate speech, divisive politics, and racially motivated acts. We’ve seen family men murdered in their Mosque, Jewish teens assaulted on their way home from school, and politicians using homophobic rhetoric. Your actions helped counter my fear for our most vulnerable community members.

For years, I crafted messages for you, hoping they’d make a difference. Little did I know that one day your messages would change me. You’ve reminded me there are no small acts when it comes to standing with your neighbour, and Canadians are still prepared to rally in the name of love.

 

With love,
Alexa Gilmour,
Minister at Windermere United Church, Toronto

]]>
Black Daddies Club https://this.org/2019/05/16/black-daddies-club/ Thu, 16 May 2019 17:25:11 +0000 https://this.org/?p=18774

Photo courtesy of Brandon Hay

I can’t count how many of my childhood Saturdays included a trip to the barbershop, so my brother could get a haircut. Each trip included a long wait and a whole lot of people locked in Patois-filled debate. So I get why Brandon Hay chose barbershops early on as a venue for the organization he founded, Black Daddies Club. They’re a natural place for Black fathers to wind up with their kids, and animated dialogue is a given.

Hay, a father of three boys, started the club in 2007 to give Black men and fathers an intimate place to share conversations and support. Initially he debated calling it just, “Daddies Club” but he worried the unique challenges Black fathers faced could be washed over.

“I wanted to be able to talk about issues specifically within the Black community. Specifically, that Black men can relate to.”

Hay’s own father was murdered, and he has family members who have been incarcerated, so he knows firsthand he systemic ways Black fathers are pulled from their children’s lives in disproportionate numbers.

When he became a father himself, he thought, “I’m just going to do everything my father didn’t do,” but he quickly realized remodelling fatherhood was hard without examples. Craving community and support as a new dad, he went to a resource centre in Scarborough to get information about their parents’ clubs. “I remember the secretary looked at me confused and saying, ‘We have programs for moms, grandparents and guardians, but nothing for fathers, not to mention Black fathers,’” he recalls. To Hay it sent a clear message that his role as a Black father was not an important one.

Another obstacle Hay saw Black dads facing was the idea that fathers must provide financially for their kids and if for whatever reason they can’t, they’ve failed already. He wanted his peers to realize that nothing beats being present. (For me, one of the most memorable moments I had with my own father was when he took my brother and me on a walking tour around Kingston, Jamaica. And it cost nothing.) To keep the focus on together time and to eliminate financial barriers, the Black Daddies Club organizes group outings for dads and their kids. In the summertime they do hikes, and they’ve also partnered with organizations like Kids Up Front Toronto to get free tickets for cultural and sporting events.

Not only does this allow Black dads to take their kids to museums and NBA games, it’s also a way to claim space en masse, in settings where Black people can feel out of place, like the Art Gallery of Ontario. “It’s this beautiful sight when you see a sea of Black men with their kids taking over the exhibit,” Hay says.

Love is shown and memories are created in intentional moments like this, and that is what makes all the difference in a parent’s relationship with their kids.

“We’re surrounded by anti-Black racism and systemic oppression, so it’s easy for internalized hate to happen,” says Hay. “I think that as Black folks we have to be super intentional about love— loving ourselves and loving others.”

]]>
Tinder is Messing With My Mental Health https://this.org/2019/05/16/tinder-is-messing-with-my-mental-health/ Thu, 16 May 2019 15:20:29 +0000 https://this.org/?p=18762

SUNDAY, 8:01 P.M.

For five days, I revisited—with rapidly increasing frequency— the WhatsApp “last-seen” status of a man I’d met on an online-dating app. I had taken note of it at first because it was, as timestamps go, significant: Sunday, 8:01 p.m. was the exact time our most recent date had begun. At first, I figured he was just busy—and, since most people don’t use WhatsApp as a default messaging application, I figured he just wasn’t logging on because he was conducting necessary communication elsewhere. But the timestamp stuck in my head, and so I couldn’t stop checking. I started checking too much. I told people I was checking. I deleted the chat thread. I deleted his contact. I re-added his contact. The timestamp was the same. I deleted everything again.

I did this two more times before he messaged me. And the emotional release—the decrease in anxiety—was palpable.
I began paying attention to other things because up until that point, for a span of nearly a week, a timestamp had taken over my entire life.

I started online dating in the summer of 2018, after becoming single at the end of a seven-year, mostly monogamous relationship. I am also clinically depressed and diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder. While online mediums make it easier for me to communicate with others free of the gut-punch nervousness I often experience when interacting with people in real life, mediums like Tinder and Bumble are built upon a framework of features that can spike feelings of stress, insecurity and self-doubt as much as mutually swiping right can alleviate them. The primary difference, though, is that the latter has a short half-life (by design), whereas the dull, gnawing hangover of the former can linger and build. Online dating, no more or less than any other online medium, has the potential for long-term mental harm.

Peer-reviewed studies about the mental-health implications of online dating are as prolific, now, as were similar studies incriminating social media, at the turn of the decade, when Facebook et al. consumed our collective consciousness. The news is predictably grim: A 2016 study by the American Psychological Association found both male and female Tinder users reported less satisfaction with their physical appearances than non-users, while male users reported lowered self- esteem. A 2018 survey of Match.com users found 15 percent felt “addicted” to the process of looking for a date; millennials were 125 percent more likely to report these feelings.

But the problem, I’ve observed in my peers as well as in myself, is not so much in the transactional nature of the dating apps—the inherent affirmation/rejection that accompanies a swipe right/left—but in the tiny digital breadcrumbs that surround each interaction. Take Sunday, 8:01 p.m., for instance. For the most part, dating apps require premium membership to observe when matches were last seen; the heightened visibility that often begets heightened paranoia and anxiety comes at a cost—and those who find themselves unwitting masochists to the Orwellian design of dating apps are easy monetary prey. It’s self-harm by subscription. Tinder, the Mack Daddy of dating apps, allows users to see how far they are from one another; paying to “fake” your location—to pretend you’re somewhere you’re not, either to gather matches for when you’re in town or disguise your location from a particularly nosy match—will cost you. On Bumble, seeing who has liked your profile rather than matching by accident is also pay-to- play. Feeld, an app where users are more likely to be looking for no-strings-attached physical relationships, also has a paid tier; it, among other things, allows you to hide your profile from Facebook friends who are also using the app.

There’s a commonality to each online dating application’s premium features: They essentially provide windows into the types of anxiety that are stoked once users move the conversation off the app, and into other mediums. WhatsApp’s last-seen feature—plus read receipts; Facebook’s newsfeed and mutual-friends collection; the three moving dots of iMessage; the bright blue light of a message received—of affirmation, of validation—and the dead, black screen of “I guess I’m not good enough.” Each tiny digital sign of life adds to a growing network of anxieties; a new spore in a massive, brain-blanketing fungal network of what-ifs. It’s consuming. It’s gut-wrenching. And, for the most part, it doesn’t feel like romance at all.

If none of this is ringing a bell to you, good: it may be the case that you haven’t entered the perilous arena of digital romance with a preexisting mental illness. But for those of us who have, the confluence of our always-on digital lives with the sometimes-there sparks of online romance can feel heady at best, enveloping at worst.

And since the mediums—and their anxiety-inductors— are so disparate, coping mechanisms tend to be ad hoc. They often manifest as patchwork digital desire paths: A friend of mine swears by muting notifications on dating apps as well as the text threads in which she’s engaging potential partners. She says that visiting those mental stimulators only when she chooses to lends a sense of control. Another puts his apps in a folder that’s not accessible from his cellphone home screen. Dozens of friends have told me about deleting Tinder, reinstalling it, deleting it again, opting for a different app, opting for two apps at once, deleting both, then starting anew.

Dating apps, ostensibly, exist to facilitate human connections. And this is why it’s so difficult to apply the advice often levelled at those of us who find social media anxiety- inducing—“Just delete it!”—to Tinder and its cousins. We can still keep in touch with our friends and family without the helping hand of Mark Zuckerberg; our phones still have, um, a phone function. But we aren’t speed-dating anymore. Swiping right is the new meet cute. And if you already tend toward introversion due to mental health issues, opting out of digital dating may seem tantamount to joining a convent. Otherwise, it’s a precarious tightrope walk, attempting to balance the temptation of choice, the promise of sexual freedom and the desire for romantic intimacy, with the anxiety-riddled need for order and no surprises. So what’s to be done?

Two weeks after the Sunday, 8:01 p.m. incident, I blocked that match from being able to contact me altogether. I needed to give myself the feeling of being in control. Shortly after, I spent some time with a casual partner of mine, who apologized for having recently gone quiet on me for a few weeks. He said he’d been experiencing a minor mental-health crisis, and had to take some time off. I was taken aback by his candour, at once happy that he felt safe enough to share this information with me, and embarrassed at my shock that, even in such a casual context, openness about mental wellness could be so easy.

I texted Sunday, 8:01 p.m. not long after. I told him I had no way of knowing if he’d reached out, because I’d blocked him, because my anxious brain needed a bit of a break. He hasn’t replied, and I don’t care if he does. I feel honest and I feel relieved, and this makes me feel more in control of my mental health than checking status updates and muting conversations. It feels better than pretending to feel nothing at all.

]]>